Editorial Process

At Confmeets Journals, we believe publishing is a partnership. We offer a unique platform for researchers to not just share their work, but to actively influence the evolution of scholarly discourse through our dynamic thematic collections.

Editorial Workflow

  • Manuscript Submission - Authors submit papers via the online portal or email.
  • Initial Screening -Our Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors conduct a preliminary review, focusing on the work's relevance, structural soundness, and novel contribution to the field.
  • Peer Review - Manuscripts are assigned to expert reviewers under a single-blind or double-blind review system.
  • Editorial Decision - Review feedback is consolidated, and authors are informed of the decision (accept, revise, or reject).
  • Revisions stage - Authors address reviewer comments and resubmit for further evaluation.
  • Final Decision - The Editor-in-Chief makes the ultimate decision regarding acceptance or rejection.
  • Production - Copyediting, typesetting, and proofing are completed to prepare the final version.
  • Online Publication - Accepted papers are published online with proper indexing and archiving.

Peer Review & Publication Flow

Author Submits Manuscript Editorial Office Triage Proceed? Desk Reject Handling Editor Assigned Assign Qualified Reviewers Peer Review Round Decision Reject Revisions Required Accept Author Revises & Resubmits Final Editorial Decision Production & Publication

Fairness & Transparency

  • Manuscripts advance based solely on their academic and scientific value, free from other influences.
  • Confidentiality of submissions and reviewer identities is strictly maintained.
  • All editors and reviewers must formally disclose any potential conflicts of interest prior to their engagement, safeguarding the impartiality of the process.
arrow_upward arrow_upward