Reviewer Guidelines

  • Overview: Peer review plays a vital role in safeguarding the integrity and academic value of published work. Reviewers are expected to deliver feedback that is fair, constructive, and academically sound.
  • Expertise: Review invitations should be accepted only when the manuscript falls within the reviewer's domain of expertise.
  • Confidentiality: Manuscripts, related data, and correspondence must remain strictly confidential.
  • Objectivity: Feedback must be clear, evidence-based, and free of personal bias.
  • Timeliness: Reviews should be submitted within the stipulated deadline to maintain an efficient publication process. In case of delays, reviewers must notify the editorial team promptly.
  • Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any competing interests that may compromise objectivity.
  • Ethical Responsibility: Any suspected cases of plagiarism, duplication, or ethical misconduct must be reported to the editor immediately.
arrow_upward arrow_upward