Department: Rehabilitation and Sports Sciences
Affiliation: Rehabilitation and Sports Sciences, Universidad Via del Mar, Via del Mar
Designation: Academic and Director of the Masters Program in Evaluation and Planning of Sports Training
Email: guillermo.cortes@uvm.cl
Country: Chile
Dr. Guillermo Andrés Cortés-Roco is a Sport and Exercise Scientist, academic leader, and researcher with extensive experience in higher education, applied research, curriculum development, and sports performance assessment. He currently serves as Director of the Master's Programme in Evaluation and Planning of Sports Training and as Curriculum Coordinator and Full-Time Faculty Member at Universidad Viña del Mar, Chile. His expertise spans exercise physiology, sports performance, physical fitness, body composition, youth development, and evidence-based training. He has supervised numerous undergraduate and postgraduate research projects and actively collaborates with sports organizations and community partners to translate scientific evidence into practical applications.
| Stage 1 |
Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check The manuscript is reviewed for journal scope, basic submission requirements, ethical compliance, and similarity/plagiarism concerns. |
| Stage 2 |
Editorial Assessment & Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo editorial assessment and independent peer review in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy. |
| Stage 3 |
Revision & Editorial Decision Authors may be requested to revise their manuscript based on reviewer and editor comments. A final editorial decision is made after the required review and revision stages are completed. |
| Stage 4 |
Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, author proofing, final quality checks, and online publication. |
| English | Publication Language |
| Single-Blind | Peer-Review Model |
| 17% | Acceptance Rate |
| <18% | Similarity Screening Guideline |
| Open Access | Access Model |
All manuscripts undergo editorial assessment and originality screening as part of the journal's evaluation process. The acceptance rate shown is based on journal-level editorial data and may change over time. Similarity reports are assessed editorially and are not interpreted solely on the basis of a numerical similarity score.