Editorial and Peer-Review Policy
Journal of Sport Medicine, Science and Rehabilitation follows the editorial and peer-review procedures described in the journal's policies and author guidelines. Manuscripts are assessed for relevance to the journal's scope, originality, methodological considerations, ethical compliance, and suitability for publication.
Key Features:
- Manuscripts undergo an appropriate editorial assessment before entering the applicable review process.
- Submissions may undergo originality, plagiarism, and research-integrity checks in accordance with the journal's policies and workflow.
- Eligible manuscripts are evaluated by appropriate reviewers and/or editors with relevant subject expertise according to the journal's stated peer-review model.
- Reviewers are expected to provide objective, confidential, and constructive evaluations in accordance with the applicable reviewer guidelines.
- Editorial decisions are made in accordance with the journal's policies, the outcome of the applicable review process, and relevant ethical and editorial considerations.
- Authors may be asked to respond to reviewer or editorial comments and submit revisions where required.
- Editors, reviewers, and authors are expected to maintain confidentiality and comply with the journal's publication ethics and research-integrity requirements.
Abstract
HTML
PDF
