Authors are requested to contact the editorial office for status updates only if the processing time exceeds the journal's stated guidelines. All inquiries must include the manuscript ID.
The Confmeets Author Portal is a secure online manuscript management platform designed to simplify the submission, review, and publication process. Authors can submit manuscripts, monitor editorial progress, receive reviewer feedback, and communicate with the editorial office through a single, user-friendly dashboard.
Our editorial workflow promotes transparency, efficiency, and timely communication, allowing authors to stay informed from initial submission through final publication.
Every manuscript follows a structured editorial process to ensure quality, fairness, and scientific integrity:
Confmeets is committed to delivering a transparent, author-focused publishing experience. Through efficient manuscript handling, ethical peer review, and continuous communication, we help researchers publish their work with confidence while maintaining high academic standards.
The Confmeets Editor Portal provides editors with a comprehensive platform to manage manuscripts efficiently while ensuring editorial quality, ethical publishing, and timely decision-making. Editors can coordinate peer review, evaluate reviewer recommendations, and oversee manuscripts throughout the publication lifecycle.
The platform supports collaborative editorial management, helping editors maintain consistency, transparency, and academic excellence across all published research.
Editors oversee each stage of the publication process:
Submission Review → Reviewer Assignment → Peer Review Monitoring → Revision Evaluation → Final Editorial Decision → Production Approval
Confmeets empowers editors with intuitive workflow management tools that improve efficiency while supporting rigorous peer review, objective decision-making, and responsible scholarly publishing.
The Confmeets Reviewer Portal enables reviewers to participate in a secure, confidential, and efficient peer-review process. Reviewers can access assigned manuscripts, submit expert evaluations, provide constructive recommendations, and support the publication of high-quality scholarly research.
Peer reviewers play an essential role in maintaining scientific integrity and improving the quality, originality, and impact of published research.
Confmeets values the expertise and dedication of its reviewers. By providing objective and timely evaluations, reviewers contribute to maintaining publication quality, strengthening research integrity, and advancing scholarly communication across diverse academic disciplines.
| Stage 1 |
Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check The manuscript is reviewed for journal scope, basic submission requirements, ethical compliance, and similarity/plagiarism concerns. |
| Stage 2 |
Editorial Assessment & Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo editorial assessment and independent peer review in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy. |
| Stage 3 |
Revision & Editorial Decision Authors may be requested to revise their manuscript based on reviewer and editor comments. A final editorial decision is made after the required review and revision stages are completed. |
| Stage 4 |
Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, author proofing, final quality checks, and online publication. |
| English | Publication Language |
| Single-Blind | Peer-Review Model |
| 17% | Acceptance Rate |
| <18% | Similarity Screening Guideline |
| Open Access | Access Model |
All manuscripts undergo editorial assessment and originality screening as part of the journal's evaluation process. The acceptance rate shown is based on journal-level editorial data and may change over time. Similarity reports are assessed editorially and are not interpreted solely on the basis of a numerical similarity score.