Confmeets is committed to advancing high-quality scholarly communication through a rigorous, transparent, and ethical publishing process. These Author Guidelines are designed to help researchers prepare manuscripts that meet international publishing standards and facilitate efficient peer review and publication.
Authors are encouraged to review these guidelines carefully before preparing and submitting their manuscripts. Adherence to these requirements helps ensure consistency, scientific integrity, and a smooth editorial workflow.
Before preparing a manuscript, authors should ensure that:
Authors should carefully review the journal's Aims and Scope before submission. Manuscripts should demonstrate scientific rigor, relevance to the journal's subject area, and contribute meaningful knowledge to the academic community.
Submissions outside the journal's scope may be declined prior to peer review.
Confmeets journals may consider the following manuscript categories:
Authors may use either:
Provided consistency is maintained throughout the manuscript.
Submissions with substantial language deficiencies may be returned for revision before peer review.
Avoid excessive formatting and automated styling features that may interfere with production processes.
The title page should include:
Manuscript Title: A concise and informative title accurately reflecting the content of the study.
Author Information: For each author provide:
Corresponding Author: Include
ORCID iD: Confmeets strongly encourages all authors to register for and provide an ORCID iD.
ORCID identifiers enhance author discoverability, improve attribution accuracy, and facilitate integration with scholarly publishing systems.
Abstract: The abstract should provide a concise summary of the study and typically include-
Abstracts should be understandable without reference to the main text.
Keywords: Authors should provide:
For research articles, manuscripts should generally contain:
Describe:
Provide sufficient detail to allow replication of the study.
Include:
Present findings clearly and objectively.
Use tables and figures where appropriate.
Avoid interpretation of results within this section.
Interpret findings in relation to existing literature.
Discuss:
Summarize major findings and their broader relevance.
Where applicable, authors should:
Authors should use the International System of Units (SI Units) throughout the manuscript.
Non-standard units should be clearly defined when first introduced.
Tables should:
Image-based tables are not acceptable.
Figures should:
Authors should ensure that figures remain legible after resizing for publication.
Authors may submit supplementary materials that support the main article, including:
Supplementary files should be clearly labelled and referenced within the manuscript.
Authors are encouraged to promote research transparency by providing information regarding the availability of underlying data.
Data may be:
A Data Availability Statement should be included when applicable.
For computational, engineering, data science, and artificial intelligence studies, authors are encouraged to provide access to:
Through recognized repositories whenever feasible.
All sources of financial support should be disclosed.
Include:
If no funding was received, authors should state:
"The authors received no specific funding for this work."
Authors must disclose any financial, professional, institutional, or personal relationships that could influence the research.
If no conflicts exist, authors should state:
"The authors declare no competing interests."
Research involving humans, animals, biological materials, or sensitive data must comply with applicable ethical standards.
Where relevant, authors should provide:
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial scholarly contributions to:
All authors share responsibility for the integrity of the published work.
Individuals who contributed to the work but do not meet authorship criteria may be acknowledged with their permission.
Authors should follow recognized reporting standards when applicable, including:
Additional discipline-specific reporting guidelines may also apply.
Submitted manuscripts must represent original work.
All submissions undergo similarity assessment and editorial screening to identify:
Manuscripts failing to meet originality standards may be rejected.
Before proceeding to manuscript submission, authors should confirm that:
| 2-5 Days | Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check |
| 25-35 Days |
Peer Review Feedback |
| 45-60 Days | Total article processing time |