Cardiac Imaging (MRI, CT, Echo) plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of cardiovascular diseases. It includes a range of non-invasive techniques such as echocardiography (Echo), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT), each offering unique insights into cardiac anatomy, function, and pathology. Echocardiography is widely used for real-time assessment of heart structure, valves, and motion. Cardiac MRI provides detailed tissue characterization, aiding in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and congenital defects. Cardiac CT excels in coronary artery visualization and calcium scoring, essential for early detection of atherosclerosis. These modalities enhance diagnostic accuracy, guide treatment planning, and monitor disease progression. Advancements in 3D imaging, contrast techniques, and AI-based interpretation are driving the evolution of cardiac imaging in personalized and precision cardiology.
| Stage 1 |
Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check The manuscript is reviewed for journal scope, basic submission requirements, ethical compliance, and similarity/plagiarism concerns. |
| Stage 2 |
Editorial Assessment & Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo editorial assessment and independent peer review in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy. |
| Stage 3 |
Revision & Editorial Decision Authors may be requested to revise their manuscript based on reviewer and editor comments. A final editorial decision is made after the required review and revision stages are completed. |
| Stage 4 |
Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, author proofing, final quality checks, and online publication. |
| English | Publication Language |
| Single-Blind | Peer-Review Model |
| 17% | Acceptance Rate |
| <18% | Similarity Screening Guideline |
| Open Access | Access Model |
All manuscripts undergo editorial assessment and originality screening as part of the journal's evaluation process. The acceptance rate shown is based on journal-level editorial data and may change over time. Similarity reports are assessed editorially and are not interpreted solely on the basis of a numerical similarity score.