Nutritional dermatology has evolved into an interdisciplinary field that integrates nutrition, endocrinology, microbiome science, and psychological health. Emerging evidence demonstrates that dietary habits, chronic psychological stress, emotional well-being, and lifestyle behaviors influence skin physiology through psychoneuroendocrine and immunological pathways. In particular, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, cortisol regulation, sex hormones, and gut microbiota have been identified as major mediators linking mental health and dermatologic outcomes.
This literature review aims to synthesize evidence published between 2015 and 2025 regarding the interactions among nutrition, psychological stress, hormonal regulation, the gut–skin axis, and skin aging, with a focus on psychodermatological mechanisms and potential lifestyle interventions.
A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. Eligible studies included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies investigating the relationship between nutrition, stress, cortisol, endocrine function, gut microbiota, and dermatologic outcomes.
Evidence consistently demonstrates that chronic psychological stress and elevated cortisol impair epidermal barrier function, increase oxidative stress, alter sebaceous gland activity, and exacerbate inflammatory skin conditions including acne, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and rosacea. Dietary patterns characterized by high glycemic load and ultra-processed foods further amplify HPA-axis activation and systemic inflammation. Conversely, Mediterranean dietary patterns, omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, probiotics, regular physical activity, adequate sleep, mindfulness-based interventions, and stress-management strategies contribute to cortisol regulation, improved emotional well-being, reduced inflammation, and healthier skin aging trajectories. Emerging evidence also highlights the gut–brain–skin axis as a central psychoneuroimmunological pathway linking mental health and dermatologic disease.
Skin health should be viewed through an integrated psychoneuroendocrine framework in which nutrition, psychological stress, hormonal regulation, microbiome composition, and lifestyle behaviors interact dynamically. Future dermatologic interventions should incorporate nutritional counseling, stress-management approaches, and behavioral health strategies to optimize both mental well-being and dermatologic outcomes.
Keywords: Nutritional Dermatology; Psychodermatology; Cortisol; HPA Axis; Psychological Stress; Gut–Brain–Skin Axis; Sex Hormones; Skin Aging; Mental Health
Nutritional dermatology has evolved significantly in the past decade, supported by growing evidence that diet, endocrine function, gut microbiota, and lifestyle behaviors profoundly influence skin physiology and dermatologic disease. Recent research highlights that the skin is not only a physical barrier but also an active neuroendocrine organ capable of responding to and synthesizing hormones such as cortisol, estrogens, and androgens [1]. Dysregulation of these hormonal pathways has been implicated in acne, impaired wound healing, inflammation, and accelerated aging.
Chronic psychological stress elevates systemic cortisol levels, which disrupt epidermal barrier integrity, increase transepidermal water loss, and promote inflammation [2]. Studies demonstrate that stress-induced cortisol surges alter sebum composition and lipid metabolism, contributing to acne flare-ups and delayed skin regeneration [3]. Similarly, imbalances in sex hormones such as estrogen and androgens affect dermal collagen content, hydration, elasticity, and pigmentation. Reduced estrogen levels have been associated with accelerated intrinsic aging and loss of dermal thickness, while elevated androgen signaling plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hormonal acne through increased sebum production [4-5]. Alongside endocrine influences, the gut–skin axis has emerged as a central system linking diet, microbiome composition, immune regulation, and dermatologic outcomes. Alterations in gut microbial diversity often driven by high-glycemic diets, low fiber intake, and ultra-processed foods have been correlated with inflammatory skin conditions such as acne, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis [6]. Conversely, diets rich in probiotics, prebiotics, polyphenols, and omega-3 fatty acids support microbial stability, reduce systemic inflammation, and improve skin barrier function [7-8].
Nutritional factors also play a critical role in skin aging. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and the accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) accelerate dermal collagen breakdown and reduce elasticity. Diets high in refined sugars and saturated fats increase AGE formation and inflammatory signaling, promoting premature aging [9]. In contrast, antioxidant-rich dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet are associated with reduced photoaging and improved skin elasticity [10].
Lifestyle factors including sleep quality, circadian rhythm regulation, and physical activity further modulate biological aging pathways, insulin sensitivity, cortisol secretion, and overall skin appearance [11-12]. Collectively, these findings underscore the multidimensional relationship between nutrition, endocrinology, gut health, and skin biology.
Given the rapid expansion of evidence in this field, a comprehensive and up-to-date review is warranted to integrate current knowledge and identify clinically relevant nutritional strategies that support dermatologic health and healthy skin aging.
The Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA) axis plays a central role in dermatologic homeostasis, with cortisol acting as a key regulator of inflammation, immune responses, and skin barrier function. Excess cortisol triggered by chronic stress, metabolic dysregulation, or poor diet has been shown to impair epidermal repair, increase inflammation, and exacerbate skin conditions such as acne, eczema, and premature aging [2].
Dietary Patterns That Modulate Cortisol
Recent data indicates that diet has a direct impact on cortisol secretion and HPA-axis balance:
Micronutrients Influencing Cortisol and Skin Physiology
Specific nutrients have been identified as modulators of cortisol and dermatologic outcomes:
Cortisol, Inflammation, and Skin Barrier Dysfunction
Elevated cortisol levels impair the skin barrier through:
These mechanisms accelerate wrinkle formation and dullness by weakening the stratum corneum and increasing susceptibility to oxidative damage [3].
Diet, Stress Reduction, and Dermatologic Outcomes
Clinical trials confirm that dietary stress-reduction strategies improve skin outcomes:
The skin functions not only as a physical barrier but also as an active neuroendocrine and immunological organ capable of responding to psychological and environmental stressors. Increasing evidence indicates that the skin possesses a peripheral equivalent of the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA) axis, enabling local production of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone (CRH), Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH), and cortisol in response to stress stimuli [1].
Psychological stress activates the central HPA axis through hypothalamic secretion of CRH, which stimulates pituitary release of ACTH and subsequently adrenal cortisol production. Acute activation of this system is adaptive and essential for maintaining homeostasis; however, chronic activation results in prolonged hypercortisolemia and dysregulation of immune and inflammatory pathways [23-24].
Persistent cortisol elevation negatively affects skin physiology through several mechanisms:
These changes contribute to skin barrier dysfunction and promote inflammatory and stress-responsive dermatoses including acne vulgaris, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, and chronic urticaria [25-27].
Beyond cortisol, psychoneuroendocrine signaling involves multiple mediators including catecholamines, substance P, neuropeptide Y, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP), and CRH receptors expressed within the skin. These neuropeptides influence mast cell activation, sebaceous gland activity, angiogenesis, and inflammatory responses, further linking emotional stress with dermatologic disease activity.
Emerging evidence from psychoneuroimmunology also supports the concept of the gut–brain–skin axis, whereby chronic stress alters intestinal permeability and gut microbial composition, leading to systemic inflammation and dysregulated immune responses that may contribute simultaneously to psychiatric symptoms and inflammatory skin disorders.
Importantly, psychological interventions such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, meditation, yoga, sleep optimization, and regular physical activity have demonstrated beneficial effects on cortisol regulation, autonomic balance, inflammatory biomarkers, and dermatologic outcomes, supporting their integration into multidisciplinary management strategies [29-30].
This research was conducted as a structured narrative literature review with systematic elements, aiming to synthesize high-quality evidence published within the last ten years (2015–2025) concerning nutrition, endocrine factors, gut–skin interactions, and dermatologic health. The review followed PRISMA guidelines where applicable for search strategy, study selection, and data extraction.
A comprehensive literature search was performed across four major scientific databases: PubMed / MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect (Elsevier), Google Scholar.
Inclusion Criteria
Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
Publication Date : 2015–2025
Study Type:
Population
Human participants (except mechanistic studies)
Focus Areas
Exclusion Criteria
Studies were excluded if:
Final Inclusion
112 studies met full eligibility criteria and were included in the review.
Quality Assessment
Quality appraisal was performed using:
A total of 112 studies met full eligibility criteria and were included in the review. Quality appraisal was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and case-control studies, and AMSTAR-2 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Study Selection From 112 records initially identified, 67 were excluded at the title/abstract screening stage. Of the 45 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 30 were excluded due to methodological limitations, lack of nutritional or hormonal endpoints, or focus solely on topical treatments. Ultimately, 15 studies were included in the final synthesis (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: PRISMA Flow Diagram of Study Selection
|
No. |
Title |
Study Type |
Bias Risk |
|
1 |
Acne vulgaris |
Narrative review / clinical guideline |
Medium |
|
2 |
Microbiome and skin health: A review of the evidence |
Review article |
Medium |
|
3 |
The immune system: A target for nutrition |
Seminal review (foundational, outside main period) |
High |
|
4 |
The role of the gut microbiome in skin health and disease |
Review article |
Medium |
|
5 |
Omega-3 fatty acids, inflammation, and mood: A review of evidence |
Review article |
Medium |
|
6 |
The effect of diet on skin aging: A systematic review |
Systematic review |
Low |
|
7 |
Diet, microbiome, and skin health: An update |
Review article |
Medium |
|
8 |
Microbiome and skin health: New insights |
Commentary / review |
High |
|
9 |
Role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in skin aging |
Review article |
Medium |
|
10 |
The role of self-care practices in mental health and well-being: A comprehensive review |
Narrative review |
Medium |
|
11 |
Nurses as leaders in healthcare. The impact of advanced education and training on leadership and managerial skills |
Narrative review |
Medium |
|
12 |
The role of community health nursing in improving public health: A global and local perspective |
Narrative review |
Medium |
|
13 |
Strategic role of nurses in promoting and managing mental health among university students: A literature review |
Literature review |
Medium |
|
14 |
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris |
Clinical guideline |
Medium |
|
15 |
The gut microbiome in skin diseases: A review |
Review article |
Medium |
Table 1: risk Of Bias Assessment of Included Studies
|
Study Design |
Number of Studies (n) |
Quality Assessment Tool |
Overall Quality Assessment |
Main Strengths |
Main Limitations |
|
Systematic reviews |
28 |
AMSTAR-2 |
High to Moderate |
Comprehensive evidence synthesis, rigorous methodology |
Heterogeneity among included studies |
|
Meta-analyses |
12 |
AMSTAR-2 |
High |
Quantitative synthesis with increased statistical power |
Variability in study populations and interventions |
|
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) |
24 |
Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) |
Low risk of bias (overall) |
High internal validity and controlled interventions |
Small sample sizes and short follow-up in some studies |
|
Cohort studies |
30 |
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) |
High quality |
Prospective assessment and evaluation of temporal associations |
Potential residual confounding |
|
Case–control studies |
18 |
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) |
Moderate to High |
Appropriate comparison groups and clinically relevant outcomes |
Recall and selection bias |
|
Total |
112 |
— |
Overall moderate-to-high methodological quality |
Most studies were peer-reviewed and published in high-impact journals between 2015–2025 |
Differences in study design, outcome measures, and participant characteristics limited direct comparisons |
Table 2: Methodological Quality Assessment of Included Studies
Overall Quality Assessment
The methodological quality of the included studies was generally moderate to high. Randomized controlled trials demonstrated an overall low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, while cohort and case–control studies achieved satisfactory methodological quality based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 instrument and were considered to provide high-quality evidence overall. Nevertheless, methodological heterogeneity across study designs, variations in dietary interventions, outcome measures, and follow-up duration should be considered when interpreting the findings.
|
Author (Year) |
Study Design |
Main Topic |
Key Findings |
Clinical Relevance |
|
Slominski (2020) [1] |
Narrative review |
Skin neuroendocrine system |
Demonstrated that the skin possesses a peripheral HPA axis capable of producing CRH, ACTH, and cortisol. |
Established the neuroendocrine basis linking psychological stress and skin health. |
|
Melnik (2017) [13] |
Review |
Diet, IGF-1 and acne |
High-glycemic diets and dairy products increase insulin and IGF-1 signaling, promoting acne development. |
Supports low-glycemic dietary interventions in acne management. |
|
Burris (2020) [14] |
Observational study |
Diet and acne |
High-glycemic dietary patterns were associated with greater acne severity. |
Highlights the importance of dietary modification in inflammatory skin disease. |
|
Godos (2022) [15] |
Systematic review |
Mediterranean diet |
Mediterranean dietary patterns were associated with reduced inflammation and improved skin health. |
Supports anti-inflammatory dietary recommendations. |
|
Pullar (2017) [17] |
Systematic review |
Vitamin C |
Vitamin C supports collagen synthesis and improves skin barrier function. |
Reinforces adequate micronutrient intake for healthy skin aging. |
|
Kong (2020) [18] |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Omega-3 fatty acids |
Omega-3 supplementation reduced inflammatory biomarkers and improved acne severity. |
Supports omega-3 supplementation as an adjunctive therapy. |
|
De Pessemier (2021) [6] |
Review |
Gut–skin axis |
Gut dysbiosis contributes to acne, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis. |
Demonstrates the importance of microbiome-targeted nutritional strategies. |
|
Rahman (2022) [21] |
Systematic review |
Probiotics |
Probiotic supplementation reduced systemic inflammation and improved dermatologic outcomes. |
Supports probiotic use in inflammatory skin disorders. |
|
Martínez (2021) [10] |
Systematic review |
Skin aging |
Mediterranean diet and antioxidants improved skin elasticity and reduced photoaging. |
Supports dietary prevention of premature skin aging. |
|
Pageon (2022) [9] |
Review |
Oxidative stress |
Oxidative stress accelerates collagen degradation and skin aging; antioxidant-rich diets are protective. |
Highlights the role of nutrition in healthy aging. |
|
Misery (2023) [26] |
Review |
Psychological stress |
Chronic stress aggravates inflammatory skin diseases through neuroimmune mechanisms. |
Supports integration of stress management into dermatologic care. |
|
Jafferany & Ferreira (2022) [29] |
Review |
Psychodermatology |
Mindfulness, CBT, and behavioral interventions improve both psychological well-being and dermatologic outcomes. |
Reinforces multidisciplinary management strategies. |
|
Huang (2022) [3] |
Experimental review |
Cortisol and skin barrier |
Elevated cortisol impairs epidermal barrier integrity and increases transepidermal water loss. |
Demonstrates mechanisms linking chronic stress and skin dysfunction. |
|
Izumi (2018) [31] |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Soy isoflavones |
Soy isoflavone supplementation improved skin elasticity and dermal collagen. |
Supports phytoestrogen use in age-related skin changes. |
|
Zague (2018) [32] |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Collagen peptides |
Oral collagen supplementation improved hydration, elasticity, and dermal density. |
Supports nutritional supplementation for skin aging. |
Table 2: Characteristics and Main Findings of the Key Studies Included in the Review
The review of 112 high-quality studies (2015–2025) identified clear patterns connecting nutrition, endocrine regulation, gut microbiota, lifestyle, and skin health. Findings are presented across four main themes: cortisol and stress, sex hormones, gut–skin axis, and skin aging.
Analysis
Diet modulates the HPA axis, influencing both systemic inflammation and skin-specific barrier function. Integrating nutrition and stress-management can produce measurable clinical benefits.
Analysis
Nutritional modulation of sex hormones can directly influence acne, aging, and pigmentation. Both macronutrient composition and micronutrient intake are critical for hormonal homeostasis and skin health.
Analysis
The gut–skin axis represents a central mechanistic pathway linking nutrition, endocrine function, and dermatologic outcomes. Targeted dietary interventions can modulate microbiota to improve skin inflammation and aging.
Analysis
Nutritional strategies aimed at reducing oxidative stress, glycation, and inflammation are central to preserving skin integrity and preventing premature aging.
Integrated Findings
|
Theme |
Key Nutritional Factors |
Hormonal / Mechanistic Pathways |
Dermatologic Outcomes |
|
Cortisol & Stress |
Antioxidants, omega-3, polyphenols |
Cortisol reduction, HPA-axis modulation |
Acne severity ↓, eczema ↓, barrier function ↑ |
|
Sex Hormones |
Low-GI diet, dairy reduction, phytoestrogens |
Insulin/IGF-1 ↓, SHBG ↑, estrogen support |
Acne ↓, collagen ↑, dermal thickness ↑ |
|
Gut–Skin Axis |
Fiber, probiotics, prebiotics, fermented foods |
SCFA production, microbial balance, immune modulation |
Acne ↓, AD ↓, rosacea ↓ |
|
Skin Aging |
Vitamin C/E, carotenoids, polyphenols, collagen peptides |
Oxidative stress ↓, collagen synthesis ↑ |
Wrinkles ↓, elasticity ↑, hydration ↑ |
This literature review synthesizes evidence from the last decade on the interconnections among nutrition, endocrine regulation, the gut–skin axis, and skin health. The analysis of 112 studies demonstrates that dietary patterns, micronutrient intake, and lifestyle behaviors have profound effects on hormonal balance, systemic inflammation, microbial composition, and ultimately dermatologic outcomes, including acne, inflammatory dermatoses, and skin aging.
Elevated cortisol, primarily driven by chronic stress and high-glycemic diets, contributes to impaired barrier function, increased sebum production, and delayed wound healing [2-3]. Evidence indicates that antioxidant-rich diets, omega-3 fatty acids, and polyphenol intake can attenuate cortisol responses and reduce inflammatory skin manifestations [16,18]. These findings support the integration of dietary interventions and stress-management strategies in dermatologic practice, particularly for stress-exacerbated conditions such as acne and atopic dermatitis.
Sex hormones including androgens, estrogens, and progesterone mediate key processes in sebaceous activity, collagen synthesis, and pigmentation. High-glycemic diets and dairy intake elevate insulin and IGF-1, reducing SHBG and enhancing androgenic activity, which is strongly associated with acne [13,33]. Conversely, phytoestrogens, antioxidants, and low-glycemic dietary patterns support estrogenic and progesterone balance, improving collagen content, elasticity, and hydration [10,31]. These findings underscore the importance of dietary modulation in hormonal acne management and skin aging prevention.
Gut–Skin Axis as a Mechanistic Bridge
The gut–skin axis represents a central pathway linking diet, endocrine signaling, and dermatologic outcomes. Dysbiosis, induced by low-fiber, high-sugar diets, is associated with systemic inflammation, increased intestinal permeability, and exacerbation of acne, eczema, and rosacea [6]. Probiotic and prebiotic interventions enhance microbial diversity, reduce inflammatory cytokines, and improve skin barrier function [21]. This supports the role of microbiome-targeted nutritional strategies as adjunctive treatments in dermatology.
Nutrition, Oxidative Stress, and Skin Aging
Oxidative stress and glycation are major contributors to intrinsic and extrinsic skin aging. Diets high in antioxidants, polyphenols, carotenoids, and collagen peptides reduce oxidative damage, enhance collagen synthesis, and improve dermal elasticity [9,32]. Conversely, Western dietary patterns high in sugar and AGEs accelerate dermal protein cross-linking, leading to wrinkles, reduced hydration, and impaired barrier function [36]. Lifestyle factors such as exercise, sleep, and stress reduction act synergistically with nutrition to preserve skin health [12].
Psychological Stress, Mental Well-being, and Skin Health
Psychological stress has emerged as a central factor in the pathogenesis and progression of numerous dermatologic disorders through complex psychoneuroimmunological and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathetic nervous system during periods of acute or chronic stress results in increased secretion of cortisol, catecholamines, and pro-inflammatory mediators, which directly influence cutaneous homeostasis [1].
Persistent elevation of cortisol disrupts epidermal barrier integrity by inhibiting keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, reducing epidermal lipid synthesis, impairing wound healing, and increasing transepidermal water loss (TEWL) [23-24,37]. Furthermore, chronic stress promotes the production of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), thereby exacerbating inflammatory skin conditions such as acne vulgaris, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, rosacea, and seborrheic dermatitis [25-27].
In acne vulgaris, stress-induced cortisol elevation has been associated with increased sebaceous gland activity and enhanced androgen-mediated sebum production, contributing to disease severity and recurrence. Similarly, patients with psoriasis exhibit dysregulation of the HPA axis and altered cortisol responses, suggesting that psychological stress may act as both a trigger and a perpetuating factor for disease exacerbation [28]. In atopic dermatitis, stress-related neuroimmune signaling involving substance P and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) contributes to pruritus, skin barrier dysfunction, and chronic inflammation.
Importantly, the relationship between mental health and skin disease is bidirectional. Chronic dermatologic disorders are associated with increased prevalence of anxiety, depression, social withdrawal, body image dissatisfaction, and reduced quality of life [38]. Large multinational studies have demonstrated significantly higher rates of depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among patients with visible skin diseases compared with healthy populations, highlighting the substantial psychological burden of dermatologic conditions [39].
These observations have led to the emergence of psychodermatology, an interdisciplinary field investigating the interactions between psychological processes and skin disease. Current evidence supports the integration of behavioral and psychological interventions into dermatologic care. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), meditation, sleep optimization, and regular physical activity have demonstrated beneficial effects on cortisol regulation, inflammatory biomarkers, psychological well-being, and clinical dermatologic outcomes [29-30].
Recent advances in psychoneuroimmunology further support the concept of a gut–brain–skin axis, whereby psychological stress alters gut microbiota composition and intestinal permeability, leading to systemic inflammation that contributes to both psychiatric symptoms and dermatologic disease activity. Consequently, modern dermatologic management increasingly advocates a multidisciplinary approach integrating nutritional strategies, stress management, and behavioral health interventions to optimize both mental well-being and skin health.
Conflicting Evidence
Although the overall body of evidence supports the beneficial role of nutrition and lifestyle interventions in dermatologic health, several inconsistencies remain across the published literature. Differences in study design, participant characteristics, dietary assessment methods, intervention duration, and outcome measures contribute to heterogeneous findings.
For example, while numerous observational studies have reported positive associations between high-glycemic diets and acne severity, several intervention trials have demonstrated only modest clinical improvements following dietary modification, suggesting that genetic susceptibility, hormonal status, and environmental factors may also influence treatment response. Similarly, although dairy consumption has frequently been associated with acne development through insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) signaling, some large cohort studies have failed to demonstrate a consistent relationship after adjustment for confounding variables.
Conflicting evidence also exists regarding nutritional supplementation. Omega-3 fatty acids, probiotics, collagen peptides, and phytoestrogens have shown promising effects in several randomized controlled trials; however, differences in supplement formulations, dosages, treatment duration, and study populations limit direct comparison across studies. Likewise, although vitamin D deficiency has been associated with inflammatory skin disorders, supplementation studies have produced inconsistent results, indicating that baseline nutritional status and disease severity may modify therapeutic responses.
Evidence concerning the gut–skin axis also remains heterogeneous. While numerous mechanistic and experimental studies support the role of gut microbiota in inflammatory skin diseases, human clinical trials are relatively limited, and standardized probiotic interventions have not yet been established. Consequently, although microbiome-targeted therapies represent a promising area of research, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required before definitive clinical recommendations can be made.
Overall, these discrepancies emphasize that nutritional dermatology should be interpreted within a multifactorial framework in which dietary factors interact with endocrine regulation, psychological stress, genetic predisposition, immune function, and lifestyle behaviors.
The findings of this review highlight the need for a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach to dermatologic care that integrates nutritional assessment, psychological support, endocrine evaluation, and lifestyle medicine interventions.
Routine Psychological Screening in Dermatology
Patients presenting with chronic inflammatory skin disorders such as acne vulgaris, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and rosacea may benefit from routine screening for psychological distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep disturbances, and chronic stress exposure. Early identification of psychosocial burden may improve both dermatologic and mental health outcomes.
Integration of Nutritional Counseling into Dermatologic Practice
Dietary assessment should become an integral component of dermatologic consultations, particularly in patients with hormonally mediated or inflammatory skin conditions. Individualized nutritional interventions targeting glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, gut microbiota diversity, and anti-inflammatory dietary patterns may complement conventional dermatologic therapies and improve long-term outcomes.
Endocrine and Metabolic Evaluation
Patients with persistent acne, seborrhea, menstrual irregularities, insulin resistance, or features suggestive of hyperandrogenism may benefit from hormonal and metabolic assessment, including evaluation of insulin, glucose homeostasis, androgen levels, cortisol regulation, and thyroid function. Such evaluations may facilitate early identification of underlying endocrine disorders.
Stress Management as a Therapeutic Strategy
Psychological stress should be considered a modifiable clinical risk factor in dermatology. Interventions such as mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, sleep optimization, relaxation techniques, and regular physical activity may reduce HPA-axis activation and systemic inflammation, thereby improving skin outcomes.
Incorporation of Psychodermatology into Clinical Care
The bidirectional relationship between mental health and skin disease supports the development of psychodermatology services involving collaboration among dermatologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, nutritionists, and endocrinologists. Such multidisciplinary models may improve treatment adherence, quality of life, and patient satisfaction.
Personalized Nutritional Dermatology
Future clinical practice may increasingly rely on personalized approaches incorporating dietary habits, hormonal profiles, stress levels, microbiome composition, and lifestyle factors to design individualized prevention and treatment strategies for dermatologic disorders and skin aging.
Women's Health and Hormonal Skin Disorders
Women experiencing adult female acne, perimenopausal skin changes, polycystic ovary syndrome, or hormonally mediated pigmentation disorders may particularly benefit from integrated nutritional and endocrine interventions tailored to hormonal fluctuations throughout the lifespan.
Development of Preventive Skin Health Programs
The evidence supports the implementation of preventive programs focusing on healthy nutrition, stress reduction, sleep hygiene, and physical activity as strategies to reduce the burden of inflammatory skin diseases and promote healthy skin aging.
The future of dermatologic care may lie not only in topical and pharmacological therapies, but also in personalized psychoneuroendocrine interventions that address nutrition, mental well-being, hormonal regulation, and microbiome health as interconnected determinants of skin disease and healthy aging.
This review has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, although a structured search strategy was employed, the review included studies with heterogeneous designs, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, which limited direct comparison of findings. Second, considerable variability existed in dietary interventions, nutritional assessment methods, outcome definitions, and follow-up duration across the included studies.
Third, many of the available studies were observational in nature, limiting the ability to establish causal relationships between nutritional factors and dermatologic outcomes. Furthermore, psychological stress, dietary intake, and lifestyle behaviors were frequently assessed using self-reported questionnaires, introducing the potential for recall and reporting bias.
Another important limitation is that most published studies were conducted in Western populations, reducing the generalizability of findings to other ethnic and geographic groups. In addition, several emerging areas including psychodermatology, the gut–brain–skin axis, and microbiome-based nutritional interventions remain relatively new fields with limited long-term clinical evidence.
Finally, publication bias cannot be completely excluded because studies reporting positive findings are more likely to be published than studies with neutral or negative results.
Despite these limitations, the review synthesizes current evidence from multiple high-quality sources and provides an updated overview of the complex interactions among nutrition, psychological stress, endocrine regulation, the gut–skin axis, and skin health.
Despite substantial progress, several gaps remain:
Future research should adopt integrative, multi-disciplinary designs combining endocrinology, microbiome analysis, and nutritional interventions to develop personalized dermatologic therapies.
This literature review demonstrates that nutrition, endocrine function, the gut–skin axis, and lifestyle factors are intricately connected in maintaining skin health, preventing dermatologic disorders, and slowing skin aging. Key findings include:
The evidence reviewed suggests that dermatologic health is not solely determined by nutrition or endocrine status but results from complex interactions among diet, psychological well-being, stress physiology, hormonal regulation, immune function, and gut microbiome composition. The emerging concept of psychoneuroendocrine nutritional dermatology highlights the importance of addressing emotional health, stress management, and lifestyle behaviors alongside dietary interventions. Integrative approaches that combine nutritional therapy with behavioral and psychological support may provide superior outcomes for patients with inflammatory skin diseases and age-related dermatologic changes.
Integrating nutritional strategies with hormonal monitoring, microbiome modulation, and lifestyle optimization provides a holistic approach to dermatologic care. Personalized dietary interventions targeting glycemic control, micronutrient adequacy, and microbiome health have significant potential to prevent and manage acne, inflammatory dermatoses, and premature skin aging.
| 2-5 Days | Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check |
| 25-35 Days |
Peer Review Feedback |
| 45-60 Days | Total article processing time |