ISSN: 3107-9024

Differential Analysis of Micro-Emotional Expressions in Autistic and Neurotypical Children using Open Face 2.0 and the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) in Naturalistic Interactions
Research Article - Volume: 2, Issue: 1, 2026 (February)

Isha Rastogi1*, Carter Sun2, Kelsie Boulton3 and Adam Guastella4

1Brain and Mind Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
2Clinic for Autism and Neurodevelopmental Research, Sydney, Australia
3,4Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

*Correspondence to: Isha Rastogi, Brain and Mind Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, E-mail:

Received: January 11, 2026; Manuscript No: JPPC-26-8379; Editor Assigned: January 19, 2026; PreQc No: JPPC-26-8379 (PQ); Reviewed: January 26, 2026; Revised: January 28, 2026; Manuscript No: JPPC-26-8379 (R); Published: February 19, 2026

ABSTRACT

The present cross-sectional observational study sought to examine disparities in the intensity and frequency of micro-emotional expressions — specifically Action Unit (AU)12 (smiling, index of social engagement) and AU45 (blinking, index of sensory sensitivity) between autistic and Neurotypical children during naturalistic, unstructured free-play interactions, highlighting an urgent gap in existing literature that predominantly relies on controlled clinical environments such as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Using convenient sampling methods, 18 age- and gender-matched children (8 autistic: mean age 8.4 years, SD = 2.7; 10 Neurotypical: mean age 8.2 years, SD = 2.5) were selected from a larger cohort study.

Open Face 2.0 along with the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) was used to computationally analyse ten-minute free-play video recordings to derive AU frequency (occurrences per session) and intensity (0–5 scale). No statistically significant variations between groups were detected using independent samples t-tests: AU12 intensity (autistic M = 0.55 ± 0.32, Neurotypical M = 0.75 ± 0.43; t(16) = 1.092, p = 0.291), AU12 frequency (autistic M = 267.8 ± 115.0, Neurotypical M = 302.8 ± 150.0; t(16) = −1.284, p = 0.217), and AU45 intensity (autistic M = 0.85 ± 0). Promising trends were indicated by moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d = −0.266 for AU12 frequency and d = −0.609 for AU45 frequency). AU12 and AU45 frequencies showed a significant positive connection across groups (r = 0.821, p < 0.01), indicating entwined social-sensory processing patterns. The results obtained indicate interpersonal variations in spontaneous emotional expressiveness in empirically relevant naturalistic situations could potentially be modest or extremely context-dependent, as opposed to consistently defined. Prospective studies ought to emphasize larger samples and multimodal approaches (e.g., physiological arousal metrics) to recognise complex behavioural trends and guide personalized, neurodiversity-affirming interventions for autistic children aiming at real-world interpersonal participation and sensory regulation without enforced Neurotypical norms of expressivity.

Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); Emotional Expressions; Action Units (AU); Open Face 2.0; Facial Action Coding System (FACS); Naturalistic Observations; Neurotypical; Social Interactions


Citation: Rastogi I, Sun C, Boulton K, Guastella A (2026). Differential Analysis of Micro-Emotional Expressions in Autistic and Neurotypical Children using Open Face 2.0 and the Facial Action Coding System (FACS) in Naturalistic Interactions. J. Psychol. Psychiatr. Vol.2 Iss.1, February (2026), pp:65-72.
Copyright: © 2026 Isha Rastogi, Carter Sun, Kelsie Boulton, Adam Guastella. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
×

Contact Emails

psychiatry@confmeets.net
support@confmeets.com
finance@confmeets.com

Article Processing Timeline

2-5 Days Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check
15
Days
Peer Review Feedback
85% Acceptance Rate (after peer review)
30-45 Days Total article processing time

Journal Flyer

Flyer Image