CRISPR and gene-editing technologies represent one of the most transformative advancements in modern genomics, enabling precise alterations to DNA sequences within living organisms. Using targeted molecular tools, scientists can add, remove, or modify specific genetic material to correct mutations, study gene function, or engineer new biological traits. CRISPR’s accuracy, efficiency, and affordability have accelerated breakthroughs in medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology. In clinical settings, gene editing holds promise for treating genetic disorders such as sickle cell disease, muscular dystrophy, and inherited blindness by directly repairing defective genes. Ongoing research explores its potential in cancer therapy, immune modulation, and infectious disease resistance. Despite its immense potential, ethical considerations and safety challenges remain critical areas of focus.
| Stage 1 |
Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check The manuscript is reviewed for journal scope, basic submission requirements, ethical compliance, and similarity/plagiarism concerns. |
| Stage 2 |
Editorial Assessment & Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo editorial assessment and independent peer review in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy. |
| Stage 3 |
Revision & Editorial Decision Authors may be requested to revise their manuscript based on reviewer and editor comments. A final editorial decision is made after the required review and revision stages are completed. |
| Stage 4 |
Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, author proofing, final quality checks, and online publication. |
| English | Publication Language |
| Single-Blind | Peer-Review Model |
| 17% | Acceptance Rate |
| <18% | Similarity Screening Guideline |
| Open Access | Access Model |
All manuscripts undergo editorial assessment and originality screening as part of the journal's evaluation process. The acceptance rate shown is based on journal-level editorial data and may change over time. Similarity reports are assessed editorially and are not interpreted solely on the basis of a numerical similarity score.