Microbiome and genomic interaction explores how the trillions of microorganisms living in and on the human body influence health, disease, and personalized medicine. The gut, skin, oral, and respiratory microbiomes all interact closely with the host genome, affecting immune responses, metabolism, inflammation, and drug efficacy. By studying microbial DNA alongside human genetic data, researchers can uncover how microbial imbalances contribute to disorders such as obesity, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative conditions, and cancer. Advances in metagenomics and sequencing technologies allow for precise identification of microbial species and their functional roles. Understanding these interactions also supports the development of targeted therapies, including probiotics, microbiome transplants, and personalized nutrition plans that align with individual genetic profiles.
| Stage 1 |
Initial Quality & Plagiarism Check The manuscript is reviewed for journal scope, basic submission requirements, ethical compliance, and similarity/plagiarism concerns. |
| Stage 2 |
Editorial Assessment & Peer Review Manuscripts that pass the initial screening undergo editorial assessment and independent peer review in accordance with the journal's peer-review policy. |
| Stage 3 |
Revision & Editorial Decision Authors may be requested to revise their manuscript based on reviewer and editor comments. A final editorial decision is made after the required review and revision stages are completed. |
| Stage 4 |
Production & Publication Accepted manuscripts proceed to production, author proofing, final quality checks, and online publication. |
| English | Publication Language |
| Single-Blind | Peer-Review Model |
| 17% | Acceptance Rate |
| <18% | Similarity Screening Guideline |
| Open Access | Access Model |
All manuscripts undergo editorial assessment and originality screening as part of the journal's evaluation process. The acceptance rate shown is based on journal-level editorial data and may change over time. Similarity reports are assessed editorially and are not interpreted solely on the basis of a numerical similarity score.